How Many of My Facebook Friends Feel Tonight

 

…and have you heard voices?.

Send to Kindle
Posted in <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/life/" rel="category tag">life</a> Tagged <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/2012/" rel="tag">2012</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/barack-obama/" rel="tag">Barack Obama</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/beyonce/" rel="tag">Beyonce</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/election/" rel="tag">election</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/politics/" rel="tag">politics</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/president/" rel="tag">president</a>

Why Ask Why?

Why Not? by BrendioI once had a boss that said we should always ask why three times. I never took up the recommendation to her face, but the advice has stuck with me for many years.

When you ask why questions, as opposed to how questions, you open people up to a more abstract way of thinking.

“‘Why’ questions make people think more in terms of the big picture, more in terms of intentions and goals, whereas more concrete ‘how’ questions are focused on something very specific, something right in front of you, basically,” said University of Illinois psychology professor Jesse Preston.

Preston, along with two other researchers, recently conducted a study to test abstract thinking’s influence on political beliefs. They used the Islamic community center and mosque in New York because it’s a strong polarizing issue.

The first study showed that after viewing a plane fly into the World Trade Center, conservatives and liberals held opposing views of the mosque at ground zero.

The second study, however, had participants answer three why questions or three how questions in a row on an unrelated subject before offering their views about the mosque.

Preston says the why questions (not the how questions) brought liberals and conservatives closer together.

“We observed that liberals and conservatives became more moderate in their attitudes,” Preston said. “After this very brief task that just put them in this abstract mindset, they were more willing to consider the point of view of the opposition.

“We tend to think that liberals and conservatives are on opposite sides of the spectrum from each other and there’s no way we can get them to compromise, but this suggests that we can find ways of compromising,” Preston continued. “It doesn’t mean people are going to completely change their attitudes, because these are based on pervasive beliefs and world views. But it does mean that you can get people to come together on issues where it’s really important or perhaps where compromise is necessary.”

Asking why questions isn’t limited to politics. It can be used in the workplace, too, granted that you have a supervisor who is open to other viewpoints. The best ones are open and will have good answers for all three of your why questions.

And if they don’t, continue asking why.

BONUS: Here’s a clip from Lucky Louie showing that by asking why one can really get to the true reason behind something.

(Story quotes from the University of Illinois. Image via Flickr: Brendio / Creative Commons.)

Send to Kindle
Posted in <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/business/" rel="category tag">business</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/leadership/" rel="category tag">leadership</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/life/" rel="category tag">life</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/research/" rel="category tag">research</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/success/" rel="category tag">success</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/work/" rel="category tag">work</a> Tagged <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/boss/" rel="tag">boss</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/conservative/" rel="tag">conservative</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/leadership/" rel="tag">leadership</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/liberal/" rel="tag">liberal</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/louis-ck/" rel="tag">Louis CK</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/management/" rel="tag">management</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/mosque/" rel="tag">mosque</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/new-york/" rel="tag">New York</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/politics/" rel="tag">politics</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/research/" rel="tag">research</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/university-of-illinois/" rel="tag">University of Illinois</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/why/" rel="tag">why</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/workplace/" rel="tag">workplace</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/world-trade-center/" rel="tag">World Trade Center</a>

Daily Show Viewers Are Deep Thinkers

Jon Stewart and Stephen ColbertThe Daily Show and The Colbert Report are two shows I never miss. I think my obsessiveness of watching them is due to that completist personality I mentioned. Or maybe it’s because I’m a deep thinker.

Hey, I didn’t say it first–a University of Delaware assistant professor in communications did. Dannagal Young surveyed 398 undergraduate students about their views of 13 different TV genres. And she discovered “meaningful differences” in how people watch The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, finding that some viewers watch the show more for context than information or fun.

Such viewers exhibit high “need for cognition,” a psychological term used to describe people who engage in and enjoy arguments, ideas and the analysis of problems and their solutions.

“It’s not about capacity to think,” Young explains. “It’s about their enjoyment of thinking.”

Young feels that “such viewers are not just watching the show for different reasons; they’re likely experiencing different impacts as a result,” Artika Rangan Casini reported for UDaily.

“We know that the reasons people seek out information strongly affect the implications of those messages,” she says. “In this case, people coming to the show looking for satirical analysis of political information may exhibit more long-lasting shifts in attitude.”

All this talk about thinking reminds me of a Brecht quote: “Thinking is one of the chief pleasures of the human race.” And for me, so is watching Jon and Stephen deliver news in humorous ways.

Send to Kindle
Posted in <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/category/research/" rel="category tag">research</a> Tagged <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/cognition/" rel="tag">cognition</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/colbert-report/" rel="tag">Colbert Report</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/communication/" rel="tag">communication</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/daily-show/" rel="tag">Daily Show</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/jon-stewart/" rel="tag">Jon Stewart</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/politics/" rel="tag">politics</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/research/" rel="tag">research</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/satire/" rel="tag">satire</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/stephen-colbert/" rel="tag">Stephen Colbert</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/thinking/" rel="tag">thinking</a>, <a href="http://www.pimplomat.com/tag/tv/" rel="tag">TV</a>