lazy – Jason Hensel

I don’t understand this new form of pride of not reading things because they’re “too long.” I’ll sometimes pass on great articles to friends or post the links on forums, and I’ll get a tl;dr (too long; didn’t read) response. I get the feeling that there is some chest puffing behind that tl;dr response.

I was reminded of this the other day when I saw this post on Tumblr from ShortFormBlog:

I agree, Ernie. It’s frustrating that people can’t even be bothered to read 300 words. At this rate, we’re going to devolve back to grunts and snorts for communication.

While I’m on the topic of grunts and snorts, I also don’t understand when people tell me that executives and leaders only want bullet points, that they don’t have time to read a full report or article. What kind of leader doesn’t want to know the whole story? If someone is too busy to read what’s put in front of her or him, then maybe that person has time management issues and shouldn’t be a leader.

I’d rather follow someone who has good critical reading and comprehension skills than someone who only wants the “highlights.” In fact, by asking someone to spoon feed you bullet points, you’re acknowledging that you’re not smart. That’s fine if you’re not smart. Just say, “I’m not smart, so please tell me the highlights of a story.”

But don’t say you don’t have time to read something. That proves you’re lazy, which is a far worse trait than ignorance.

Send to Kindle

The reason people believe misinformation is because they’re lazy, according to new research from the University of Western Australia. In “Misinformation and its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing,” psychological scientist and study co-author Stephan Lewandowsky says that misinformation can cause a lot of damage at a societal level and a global level. As reported by the Association for Psychological Science, though, shedding false beliefs takes work.

Weighing the plausibility and the source of a message is cognitively more difficult than simply accepting that the message is true – it requires additional motivational and cognitive resources. If the topic isn’t very important to you or you have other things on your mind, misinformation is more likely to take hold.

And when we do take the time to thoughtfully evaluate incoming information, there are only a few features that we are likely to pay attention to: Does the information fit with other things I believe in? Does it make a coherent story with what I already know? Does it come from a credible source? Do others believe it?

Misinformation is especially sticky when it conforms to our preexisting political, religious, or social point of view. Because of this, ideology and personal worldviews can be especially difficult obstacles to overcome.

As I mentioned, laziness is the culprit here, and that’s okay. Personally, I’d rather watch The Daily Show than The O’Reilly Factor, because I know I’ll agree with its narrative more than the other. I also know, too, that I should expose myself to other viewpoints more than I do so that I can become better well-rounded and educated. However, I’m lazy. Plus, I find Jon Stewart funnier than Bill O’Reilly. I’m a sucker for comedy.

(Image via Flickr: jimjarmo / Creative Commons)

Send to Kindle

Jason Hensel

My Quarterly Rant About Lazy Readers

Why Misinformation Sticks